Minutes Kerviel: "They are all guilty!"
When the vox populi expressed through an associate professor of finance, here is what happens at the trial of Jerome Kerviel.
Attorney Philip Bourion: "Who do you think is guilty?"
Catherine Lubochinsky, witness: "They are all guilty! The internal control of Societe Generale did not work. "
The pithy statement sums up the impression left after two weeks of debate – will resume Monday morning. On the one hand, the defense of the former trader is reluctant to admit that the bank "knew everything" of its investments delusional. Suppose that after the first coup win € 500,000 in 2005, the young daring to be seen gently lectured and implicitly encouraged to supplement his income by marauding on land more profitable than its cushy turbo warrants.
But how can we believe for one second that the SocGen has been tacitly approve of Mr. Kerviel is 49 billion euros, or one and half times its equity, as a builder who wants to elevate a building, while undermining its foundations?
Similarly, if the bank "knew everything", the name of what bounty would she let her trader-playing with the kamikaze 1.4 billion by some miracle he had won in December 2007, at a time – crisis subprime – where the cash was missing around the world?
Mixed results in terms of image
Jerome Kerviel's lawyer, Olivier Metzner Me, excels, however, in another field. While the client is regularly scolded by a president Pauthe excellent and witty, he revels in the main plaintiff tease – the bank.
Sunglasses nose, in the proper dress casually maker unbuttoned, one hand in the pocket, it is amusingly sly when his client is woefully stiff. This significant mob, which grows out of court a look Churchillian (cigar, no doubt, "no sport") reveals an unexpected gift for comedy courtroom upscale. And when questioning a witness, there is no lack of pacing responses of "agree" sound, which are seen as the architect of an alleged consensus: according to Ms. Metzner, everyone knows that the bank knew everything.
This assumption and the provocations of his zealot infuriate the advice of SocGen, My Jean Veil, François Martineau and John Reinhart. The first, known for his character, say, entire, up to the net to return the smashes grinning defense. So he endorses the range of fatally bad, who is never "agree".The roundness of the old, somewhat obsequious, from Mr. Martineau, and the projections more or less come to me Reinhart are supposed to smooth the image that ill becomes belligerent to a victim.
Result: a judicial perspective, the SocGen, which accuses the defendant not without arguments for having lost 4.9 billion euros, is in apparent position of superiority. Mr. Kerviel acknowledged Wednesday that he had committed the acts he is charged and for which he faces five years in prison. The weakness in his defense is a question: if "everybody knew, why he invented large-scale fictitious transactions to conceal his real positions, as well as earnings losses?
But in terms of image, the picture is more mixed.The refrain of "all guilty", which floods the Internet to which Professor Lubochinsky Thursday offered a providential respectability for the defense, made his way. Whatever the outcome of the trial – there is a week of discussions – the SocGen not willing to spend for naïve or incompetent: the victim must also face prosecution in international finance.
ALSO READ:
Jerome Kerviel admits to having produced false
For his boss, Kerviel was a "criminal behavior"
"Kerviel: Societe Generale could not not know"